Previous Entry | Next Entry

Since we're speaking of the good ol' days

  • Apr. 15th, 2009 at 9:08 AM
toomuchplor: (radieuse)
[livejournal.com profile] denyeverything1 reminded me about an essay I wrote in SV once upon a time, so I unearthed it from ye olde [livejournal.com profile] rose_emily LJ and reposted it onto my site, here. The synopsis is that I'm talking about male vocal types and how we relate heroism to tenors. It all comes back to Smallville and Clark Kent.

Tags:

Comments

[identity profile] teenygozer.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 03:25 pm (UTC)
I'm so glad you put it somewhere we could find it, I was trying to think of a non-obnoxious way to ask you to unearth it for your Gentle Readers.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 09:23 pm (UTC)
Hee! I don't mind. It was a bit of a chore to figure out when exactly I'd written it in almost four years of stuff on that LJ but I stumbled upon it at last!
[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 05:00 pm (UTC)
Very interesting! I've often wondered about "why so many tenors", especially since I don't think of it as a particularly *manly* voice -- baritone is to me the default male voice.

I didn't know that Jesus was traditionally a bass, because of course he's the lead tenor in JC Superstar, also in Godspell. Interestingly, Judas is also a tenor in JCS, but he's a baritone in Godspell.
[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 05:14 pm (UTC)
Nother question!

Since you have ChoralLeader!Superpowers, tell me: what are Jensen Ackles' & Jared Padelecki's natural singing registers?
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 09:45 pm (UTC)
Hrm, I'd have to watch a little bit of Supernatural to refresh my memory (what a hardship!) but my first gut instinct is that Jensen is a baritone (maybe even a bass-baritone, he has quite a low voice) and Jared is a tenor.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 09:26 pm (UTC)
I didn't know that Jesus was traditionally a bass, because of course he's the lead tenor in JC Superstar, also in Godspell. Interestingly, Judas is also a tenor in JCS, but he's a baritone in Godspell.

Yes, and these are the same questions we all had for my prof at the time. I think it was in the comments of this post originally that I remember discussing this -- I think Andrew Lloyd Webber did something a bit extraordinary in making Jesus (and Judas, for that matter) a tenor in JCS. In the 20th/21st century we like our god figures to be much more human, and the Jesus of JCS (and the Judas) are eminently human. But that's not the way things have been done traditionally.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 09:26 pm (UTC)
(I don't know Godspell, so I can't comment on that one!)
[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 11:52 pm (UTC)
For these purposes -- it doesn't bring the Jesus/Judas the way JCS does, *g*, which IMHO is part of the point ALW had in making them both tenors.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 12:12 am (UTC)
Ah, okay. Yes, I'm pretty sure ALW's choice was a deliberate one there.
[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 03:51 am (UTC)
In the 20th/21st century we like our god figures to be much more human

not necessarily -- I must recommend Leo Steinberg's The Sexuality of Christ in Renaissance Art and Modern Oblivion (http://www.amazon.com/Sexuality-Christ-Renaissance-Modern-Oblivion/dp/0226771873/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1239853710&sr=8-1), as a counterweight. The Incarnation used to be taken *very* seriously.

Steinberg's work predicts that Jesus might have been a tenor earlier, in the early Baroque and before, but I don't know if there's enough music left from back then to tell. And of course you couldn't make a castrato Jesus, so that may have forced the Jesus role into a lower register by contrast.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 03:59 am (UTC)
Hmm, maybe I'm thinking more of the post-Reformation concept of a "personal Savior". As a singer, I haven't encountered much early music (though granted, not at all my area of specialty) that has the kind of "Jesus died for me me me me" theme you find in contemporary Christian praise songs. (Can you tell I hate those songs?) It's the first-person-ness that I meant, the focus on "I" versus "we". It's one of the most annoying things about contemporary church music IMO. There is a song (which I have banned from my church) that has the line "Jesus, I am so in love with you." Creepy.

I guess if any one Christian figure was fetishized as extraordinarily "personal" in the Medieval/early Baroque period, it's probably Mary. In what I've encountered in music, she tends to be the human face of the divine, and can be appealed to on the basis of her humanity (read: femininity).
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 07:25 pm (UTC)
Hi,

Very interesting essay. How do you think all this relates to SGA (I know nothing of music and tenor/bass/etc., but I hear John as having a very low voice, and Rodney a very high one, yet both are heroes in their own way...)? What singing voice do they have? As a linguist I also find this fascinating.

-The Linguist Lurker (I just started reading your lj so, hi!)
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 09:32 pm (UTC)
How do you think all this relates to SGA

Interesting -- I wrote this before I had watched SGA, so I have to think about this for a bit. I often see both John and Rodney described as having low voices in fic, but all you have to do is compare them to Ronon and you realize -- they really don't. Ronon/Jason Momoa is probably a bass-baritone (that voice type sandwiched between the lowest and the middle voice types for men) whereas Rodney and John are both baritones. I might even be tempted to put John down as a tenor, truth be told, because there is quite a lot of lightness to his tone. But I think the impression of John having a low voice comes from the "tough guy" talk he does a lot on the show. Joe Flanigan, as John, uses vocal fry (I don't know the linguistic term here, but it's that low popping noise that's actually a different vocal mechanism than normal phonation) a *lot* when he's being Col. Action Hero, but his speaking voice is quite a bit higher. Rodney/David Hewlett has somewhat more of a mellow, lower voice compared to John/JF, but again, his character spends a lot of time doing hysterics and that means he talks quite high in his natural range, sometimes even in falsetto. It's actually quite interesting that both these guys almost play against their voice types.
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 10:34 pm (UTC)
wow, this is really cool. I have no musical ear at all so it shouldn't be a surprise that I was so wrong as to the type of voice they had. But of course now it makes sense. And you are absolutely right about JF and DH, that they go against their voice types. I noticed that with JF, because his voice as Sheppard often makes me flinch. I had no idea he was actually using vocal fry (that is also the correct word in phonetics, or creaky voice), I have no idea how I missed that (I guess that's why I'm still in school). I'll have to watch SGA again to make sure :P
Then it would be safe to say that JF probably believes that a low voice makes more of a "tough guy" or "action hero", which is interesting.
Thanks for your answer - it's making me all happy to see SGA in a different light :)
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 11:03 pm (UTC)
I wonder if it's proper vocal fry or if he's just sort of forcing his voice down lower. I don't usually associate vocal fry with very energetic speaking, now I come to think of it, and most of the time, badass!John is pretty intense. Either way, if you compare his voice when delivering normal dialogue to his voice when he's being the action hero, you can hear there's about a fifth drop in register from one to the other. (I'm such a nerd, I played a bit of "The Shrine" with my tuner open and yes, John/JF talks around a G or F below middle C in normal speech, which is consistent with a baritone or lower tenor. Rodney/DH talks about a third lower when he's not whining, around a D or E. It's not a huge difference, but enough to put DH one rung lower on the vocal fach scale.)
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 11:12 pm (UTC)
I always associated vocal fry with horror movies or 'funny' effect, although I think it might be phonemic in some languages. Are you saying DH actually has a lower voice than JF? I'm not sure I follow. And what do you mean with "when he's being the action hero", like when he's mouthing off to the wraith as compared to when he's just talking with Rodney? Anyway, as soon as exams are over I'm doing a speech spectrogram of JF's voice to see about that creaky voice. Might even compare their fundamental frequency, which is what I think you've been doing (musical vs. linguistic terms are always so confusing! we're talking about the same thing but using words that are foreign to me!)
Should be interesting :D
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 11:42 pm (UTC)
I always associated vocal fry with horror movies or 'funny' effect, although I think it might be phonemic in some languages.

My vocal tech prof used to say that it was part of male adolescent vocal development -- because so many teenage boys spend a few years talking in vocal fry to sound cooler. It's a hard thing to emulate in a female voice but I can attest to the fact that a lot of young male singers do talk in this way, trying to make their voices sound lower. I think of, for example, the character of Jack Donaghy on 30 Rock -- talking almost exclusively in that vocal fry. It's sort of contemporary badass shorthand.

Are you saying DH actually has a lower voice than JF?

Yes, though they are very close. Put it this way -- if they both auditioned for my choir tomorrow (IF ONLY) I would probably put JF on tenor 2 and DH on baritone. Within my choir, many of these voices are nearly interchangeable in terms of their vocal range but the tenor 2s tend to have a slightly lighter registration which makes them more pleasant to listen to in the upper range. A baritone around a middle C (about 278 Hz) starts sounding a little too powerful and may overbalance the ensemble. (This is, of course, assuming either of them could carry a tune.)

And what do you mean with "when he's being the action hero", like when he's mouthing off to the wraith as compared to when he's just talking with Rodney?

Yes, essentially. When John's being intense and tough and/or emotional for that matter, his voice drops quite a bit. In normal calm dialogue, it rises again. It's kind of the opposite of Rodney (though Rodney's "intense" is less tough and more "hysterical".)

Might even compare their fundamental frequency, which is what I think you've been doing (musical vs. linguistic terms are always so confusing! we're talking about the same thing but using words that are foreign to me!)

*g* Yes, I mean the fundamental frequency. I've done a little bit of acoustics during my music studies so really I should be the one attempting to change languages here! And it sounds very cool, the spectrogram thingy! I'd be curious to hear more about it when you do that!
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 12:13 am (UTC)
hahaha, more proof that Sheppard is actually a 15 year-old at heart!

Hmm, now what's the most intense scene, for Sheppard? For Rodney (I'm tempted with the "you should have seen this, I was amazing!" from The Lost Boys, which is extremely high in all the word's meaning). Oh, a lot of SGA watching in my future. I like this.

I didn't mean you should be speaking a different language :P I meant I should broaden *my* horizons! I'm using the software praat (http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/). I'll let you know as soon as I do it :D
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 12:19 am (UTC)
hahaha, more proof that Sheppard is actually a 15 year-old at heart!

YES. I didn't even go there, but YES.

Hmm, now what's the most intense scene, for Sheppard?

Good question... I would probably go with something from that episode where he's captured by Kolya and first meets Todd (the name escapes me). He's pretty intense in that ep. But you can probably find an example of him grating away in just about any scene where Rodney is pissing him off by dithering about some repair.

I find linguistics/speech path SO fascinating -- and I know it goes the other way, too. I've had no fewer than four speech path and linguistics grad students in my choir, all champing at the bit to learn more "music speak" for what they were studying in school
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 12:32 am (UTC)
Good idea. I'll look at that ep.

I think music as an application of linguistics is really fascinating (well, music in and of itself as well!). Some of the articulatory movements required for some types of singing are just unbelievable (I read an article on Swedish kulning songs where the singer moved her larynx by at least 6 or 8 cm, which is just... wow!).
And sorry for using up all this comment space!! But linguistics + SGA is just a favourite topic of mine.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 01:13 am (UTC)
No worries! I love giant comment convos and this is so interesting to me!

I probably shouldn't get started on the African clicks we do in our choir, then, huh? *g*
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 01:16 am (UTC)
Do you really?????
You have my undivided attention (well, apart from this exam which also demands my attention). Please do tell!
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 01:24 am (UTC)
My organization has a long history of association with southern African music, with twin choirs in Namibia and South Africa. We've travelled there twice on tours and we have exchange members going back and forth every year now, so we've had a lot of access to Xhosa and Damara/Nama speakers, both languages having four different kinds of clicks in them. Many of our kids seem to pick up some of the "hard" (they mean difficult, but they also happen to be the clicks produced on the hard palate) clicks quite easily with a little practice. I'm not as good at the hard clicks myself but we do our best!

Here, have a sample track by our twin choir (who do clicks one gazillion times better than we do even though not all of them speak Damara/Nama): http://www.sendspace.com/file/zw43k3 (http://www.sendspace.com/file/zw43k3)
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 01:34 am (UTC)
that is sooo cool. It sounds like they're snapping their fingers, but they're making normal sounds in their language! It always sounds so strange to my ears. I love it! Whenever I try to do clicks, there's what seems to be a long pause before I actually do my click, so it never sounds like "running" speech at all. One day I shall learn, I hope!
Thanks for the sample!
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 01:40 am (UTC)
Haha, you get used to it being "normal" when you are living with an exchange singer and hear them talking on the phone in Damara all the time! It's always entertaining though!

Whenever I try to do clicks, there's what seems to be a long pause before I actually do my click, so it never sounds like "running" speech at all.

This is ALL of us at first, but you get faster when you simply have to stay in rhythm! I still get stymied when there are several different clicks in a single phrase. They all turn into the same one over and over.
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 01:58 am (UTC)
I think it's really sad that most people never hear clicks. When I watched The Gods Must Be Crazy with a friend, she was convinced that the clicks had been added post-production, just "thrown" on the original dialogue. And it does sound that way! Now at least I have two schemes of reference when thinking about clicks, which is still extremely pathetic, especially for a linguist. (Not to mention that now, creaky voice = Sheppard, for me.)
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 01:35 am (UTC)
I can't help myself, here's another track. This time it's my choir singing but our Namibian (Damara) exchange singer says a Damara prayer in the middle. Here: http://www.sendspace.com/file/o0s6py (http://www.sendspace.com/file/o0s6py)
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 02:03 am (UTC)
This was also beautiful!! You can tell your choir tomorrow that a random stranger thinks you all sing very well! (Of course I have no *idea* what would be good or not apart from "it sounds good", but still.)
[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 04:00 am (UTC)
So those are native speakers singing? Wow, that's so *different*! I've only heard clicks in very brief, poor, National Geographic-type videos before.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 04:05 am (UTC)
Yes -- or, rather, a qualified yes. They are Namibians, and there are 11 ethnic groups in that country. Only some of those groups are represented in this choir, and of those, only one or two groups have clicks in their mother tongue. (They all speak English and Afrikaans too.) But having grown up around many speakers of the "clicking" languages (Damara and Nama) almost all the singers are very good at doing the clicks themselves.

The other track I linked further down does have a native Damara speaker doing the prayer in the middle, if you want a comparison.

The clicks are CRAZY loud when you hear them in person. As children, the native speakers play tongue-twister games involving all four clicks -- we get our Damara exchange students to do the tongue twister for choirs in workshop and it never ceases to boggle the mind. Two of the clicks are quite easy for Westerners to reproduce and two are NOT.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 04:14 am (UTC)
This track (http://www.sendspace.com/file/6z3ary) has three of the four clicks in the opening verse -- the first you hear (twice in a row) is notated as [!] and is a hard "back" hard palate click. The third click you hear is a second kind of click, notated [//]. And the fourth click is harder to hear, and is the third type, notated [/]. This one we can do -- it's like clucking to beckon a pet.

You actually hear the fourth kind of click at the beginning of the soloist's second phrase, too -- a little "squeaky" almost, it's a "side" click and it's notated as [#] (I think! I'm getting fuzzy on them now!). This is like clucking to a horse. We can do this one too.

One of our Namibian friends started teaching this piece to my choir and gave up after we couldn't get the opening phrase right. (And he's not a native speaker of Damara either!) But I love love love this piece -- so beautiful, and the soloist is so full of beauty when she sings. It's a lullaby, in case it's not apparent.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 04:16 am (UTC)
I forgot to add -- the second kind of click, [//], is also a hard palate click but is produced much closer to the front of the mouth.
[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 11:58 pm (UTC)
Did either of you ever read Silver City Risen (http://community.livejournal.com/sga_flashfic/479523.html): SGA as an opera in an artificial (well duh), Pegasus style. In this tradition, male roles are traditionally taken by castrati -- "MAJOR-CAPTAIN SHEPPARD, duke of Atlantis" is a soprano, while "RODNI MCKAY, chief sage of Atlantis" is the first major role for an entire male, a tenor.
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 12:12 am (UTC)
I have not read that! *opens in another tab* Thanks!
[identity profile] distorquere.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 12:32 am (UTC)
I think all of this story was completely lost on me, but it was entertaining anyway. It really needs to be vidded (so I would hear the songs)!
[identity profile] rheanna27.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 08:14 pm (UTC)
I know almost nothing about music, but found that absolutely fascinating. Thanks for dusting it down!
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2009 09:35 pm (UTC)
Glad you liked! It made me grin a bit to realize I'd thoughtfully defined "tenor" and "bass/baritone" at the beginning of the thing and then launched into words like "oratorio" with zero explanation. It's good to know you found it interesting!
[identity profile] bathsweaver.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 12:26 am (UTC)
Oh, that essay was fascinating. Thanks so much for the repost!
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 01:13 am (UTC)
No problem! Glad you enjoyed!
[identity profile] denyeverything1.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 03:18 am (UTC)
If I'd known I would get to spend some time not only re-reading the essay but the fascinating conversation between you and [livejournal.com profile] distorquere, I would have mentioned the essay a lot sooner. *g*

Thanks for re-posting it!

Edited because grammar hates me almost as much as html does...
[identity profile] toomuchplor.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 16th, 2009 03:40 am (UTC)
No problem! And I'm glad you mentioned it too! It seemed to prompt some great discussion!

Latest Month

January 2021
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars